The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.
The plaintiff is claiming that these actions caused “severe emotional distress and trauma to the Plaintiff, resulting in frustration, disappointment, and psychological harm as a fan.”
He is seeking quite the hefty return: (1) a “formal acknowledgement” of the emotional distress “caused by [the NFL’s] actions and statements”; (2) a “retraction of the slanderous statements,” along with an apology to Sanders; (3) implementation of “fairer practice in the drafting process to ensure that talented players are recognized and given opportunities based on merit”; and (4) $100 million in punitive damages.